最好看的新闻,最实用的信息
11月08日 27.0°C-32.7°C
澳元 : 人民币=4.75
布里斯班
今日澳洲app下载
登录 注册

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图)

2020-02-10 来源: Sarah 评论99条

【今日澳洲2月10日电】(实习记者Sarah)近日有读者爆料,一座可容纳数百人、占地超1000㎡的大型清真寺将建在悉尼Hurstville的学校附近。乔治河联合会得知此事后,冒雨召开当地居民大会并发起抗议。

“今天提交反对,就是为了预防以后可能出现在您家门口的清真寺。”乔治联合会在微信公众号“南区居民”中写道。

冒雨派发传单,乔治河联合会再出手

据了解,计划新建的清真寺位于卡尔顿区(Carlton),将征用Botany Street 90-92以及旧的养老院。“南区居民”指出,新址与Hurstville精英中学Sydney Technical High School毗邻而建,距离Hurstville Public School仅400米。

乔治河联合会收到消息后,于2月8日(上周六)召开当地居民大会,当天近百位邻居冒雨前来,义工在瓢泼大雨中派发传单。

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 1

(图片来源:微信公众号南区居民)

乔治河联合会会长王斌向居民分享了过去与不合理开发项目的抗争经验,呼吁居住在Hurstville 附近的居民挺身而出, 为今天和以后的安宁发声。

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 2

(图片来源:微信公众号南区居民)

“南区居民”称,虽然说从反对的角度讲,附近的居民更有发言权,但是为了引起市议会对民意的注意,和对宗教祭拜场所申请的警觉。

大家可以通过三种方式发声:

(一)在乔治河联合会官网提交反对意见

清真寺申请新址:88-92 Botany Street Carlton NSW 2218

DA号:DA2019/0644

反对信截至日期:2月26日

(“南区居民”提供的反对信英文模板见文末)

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 3

(图片来源:微信公众号南区居民)

点击提交反对信>>

(二)在请愿网站签名抵制

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 4

(图片来源:今日澳洲APP)

请愿主要围绕交通安全隐患和噪音干扰提出抗议,指出Botany Street 90-92以及旧的养老院将会被清真寺占用,届时每天早上5:30至晚上10点,将会涌入数百人,安静的街道不复存在。

其中指出,Botany街距离四所学校都很近,来往人流和车流本就很密集,过去5年中就有两名孩子在毗邻街道遭遇交通事故丧生。

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 5

选址与Hurstville公立学校直线距离约400米(图片来源:今日澳洲App)

另外,清真寺新址与附近社区“画风迥异”,祈祷时间昼夜不息,斋月活动更是加剧噪音和扰乱,不可控因素随之变多。

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 6

信徒匍匐于清真寺外祷告(图片来源:网络)

截至发稿前,已有1500余人签名。

点击签署请愿书>>

(三)加入微信群参与抗议

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 7

(图片来源:微信公众号南区居民)

今日澳洲App记者得知,这已不是乔治河联合会第一次抵制新建清真寺了,本网早先已曾多次报道其抵制行动。

“南区居民”指出,早在2015年底 South Hurstville清真寺的申请,在悉尼引起了轩然大波。当时,数以千计的居民,或向市政陈情不满,或寻求法律咨询,或游说各级议员,或投稿报刊,以各种形式表达了对这个申请的强烈反对。

经过一年多的努力,该清真寺的申请于 2016 年 11 月正式被土地和环境法庭(NSW Land and Environment Court)驳回, 且终止了上诉渠道。

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 8

(图片来源:微信公众号南区居民)

乔治河联合会在“南区居民”呼吁每一个居住在Hurstville 附近的居民,都能挺身而出,保护家园。“今天提交反对意见书, 就是为了预防以后可能出现在您家门口的清真寺,向市议会发出我们居民的预警信号。”

附:乔治河联合会发布的反对信英文模板:

Dear George River council officer and councillors:

My name is: xxxxxxxx, I live in xxxxxxxxx Street, Carlton. As a George River Council rate payer and resident, I am a very worried and extremely concerned resident directly affected by the proposed DA2019/0644. A Mosque on 88-92 Botany Street ISN'T an appropriate site for such a HIGH impact development for a local suburban residential area.

1. It is not in the Public interest. According to Environmental Planning Laws, the public building is required to serve in the Public Interest of the local residents. According to the latest ABS consensus in 2016, only around 3-7% of population are Muslims who live around the Carlton and Hurstville area. This construction of a Mosque obviously does not meet the majority residents’ needs in the area. There is NO BENEFIT to our local or wider community for such a Mosque, not to mention the proximity to other local and near mosques in Wolli Creek, Rockdale, Arncliffe, Tempe, Penshurst, Kingsgrove and Roselands.

2. The operating hours of this Mosque are unacceptably long. The Mosque proposes 7 days prayers 365 days from 5:30 am to 10:00 pm. No other establishment in the local vicinity is allowed to operate within such hours.

3. Traffic and noise impacts during Friday Evening and Ramadan celebrations are unpredictable. Majority of the visitors to the Mosque will be from out of area. According to the existing Research Studies , it is more likely the attendance during the Ramadan will exceed the capacity of the proposed development. The local residents will suffer the safety risk of insufficient and illegal parking as well as the noise made by a whole group of worshippers who could not get into the Mosque.

4. Internal noise levels will be intolerable to nearby residents. The long operating hours must come with long hours of noise that results from cars constantly driving in and out and the gathering of worshippers before, during and after the prayers. In summer season, a lot of the nearby residents leave their doors and windows open, the noise mentioned above would impact the residents even more. Children will not be able to concentrate on homework or study. Families will see a big impact to their daily routine which might cause health issues such as insomnia and depression.

5. Transportation traffic Load. Botany Street is adjoined by Ethel Lane on the west, a narrow 2 way street with the width of only 4.1 – 4.9 meters, for which concerns have already been raised by residents to the council since 2014. We have witnessed many occasions of accidents at the intersection of Ethel Lane and Botany Street, at least once per year. For students walking back home through this narrow street after school, the pedestrian areas are just not wide enough to walk safely. Xenia avenue, the back road of the venue, has its own challenge already with particular hazards when crossing the 2 way narrow road with limited pedestrian area. Botany street has been the thoroughfares for both vehicles and pedestrians used by students, local residents and residents from adjoining communities. The traffic and parking on the roads are already at its maximum capacity. The traffic and parking demand from the mosque as such a large public place of worship would aggravate the traffic load.  

6. Safety to local residents and students of the nearby 4 schools. Botany street is at the heart of four local schools, Sydney Technical High School, Bethany College, St Mary’s Star of the Sea Primary School and Hurstville Public school. A hefty amount of parents send and pickup their children through this place. We’ve seen 2 tragedies of children died from road accidents in the past 5 years from this local community. With the exponential traffic burden introduced by the mosque, we can only expect more. The physiological suffering from seeing these cases by many cannot fade, and the communities are distressed that their own children and family are exposed to higher risks.  

7. The DA has made vague statements and assumptions about impact to local communities. Such assumptions are not supported by facts, and thurs are questionable and unreliable.

As a local resident, I would like to urge you to take our opinions into consideration and reject this proposal.  

Please feel free to contact me via this email if more or further information is requested.

Best Regards,

相关新闻:

从一间茅屋开始星火燎原,到密布全国万人朝拜,细说澳洲清真寺的前世今生(组图)

悉尼超大清真寺提案现场听证!数百中西居民举牌抵制,忧5000穆斯林涌入朝拜(视频 / 组图)

悉尼清真寺赢DA后本周日开放,向邻居示好?逐渐遍布全城,清真寺带来怎样的不安?(图)

惜败!悉尼南区清真寺扩建案最终获批,2000华人联名抵制仍失败!行动组:很遗憾、不理解...(视频 / 组图)

悉尼南区又见清真寺DA,近2000居民在线抵制!这一次,要建在学校门口了(组图) - 9

关键词: 清真寺
原创声明:本文系本站原创采写,未获本站书面授权严禁转载!在获授权前提下,转载必须在醒目位置注明本文出处和具体网页链接。对未注明而擅自转载者,本站保留追究法律责任的权利。
今日评论 网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明网站立场。
最新评论(99)
悉尼北海岸会计事务所
悉尼北海岸会计事务所 2020-02-10 回复
如果穆斯林信徒众多 为什么不在偏远郊区建个如南天寺一样的清真寺呢 ? 想朝拜 没问题 整个山头都给你 跪一天也与他人无关
Alan H
Alan H 2020-02-10
因为他们要一天拜5次
3388
3388 2020-02-10
赞同
阿东
阿东 2020-02-10
同意
昵称居然不能重复?
昵称居然不能重复? 2020-02-10 回复
在那块儿地里埋个猪头,问题就解决了
史提芬.張
史提芬.張 2020-02-10
任務交給你
我不是安东尼
我不是安东尼 2020-02-13
哈哈哈哈哈
Pushua
Pushua 2020-02-10
埋个地雷更好些😂
土澳居民HdTlO
土澳居民HdTlO 2020-02-10 回复
看看你们这些人的评论。这才是种族岐视。你们也配叫人。
Joannek的迷之破胸喪
Joannek的迷之破胸喪 2020-02-10
因短时间内多条评论违规被举报,触发自动屏蔽机制,该用户评论均被屏蔽。
AnthonyFeng
AnthonyFeng 2020-02-10
异教徒都应该去死,这是古兰经中明确提到的!所以我也是种族歧视,歧视所有穆斯林!
少年先疯队员
少年先疯队员 2020-02-10
我承认我就是种族歧视,在穆斯林眼中,黄种人、白种人、黑种人,只要不信奉伊斯兰教的通通都是异教徒。你猜穆斯林是怎么对待异教徒的呢?
果不奇然
果不奇然 2020-02-11 回复
也是 像南天寺这样的寺庙 也没有健在人口密集区域 毕竟会打扰民居生活 遇到大的朝会 交通就是头号难题 建议他们搬到远一点的地方 其实还是政府不作为 不想得罪他们
正义火焰
正义火焰 2020-02-10 回复
澳洲中部有的是地方。


Copyright Media Today Group Pty Ltd.隐私条款联系我们商务合作加入我们

电话: (02) 8999 8797

联系邮箱: [email protected] 商业合作: [email protected]网站地图

法律顾问:AHL法律 – 澳洲最大华人律师行新闻爆料:[email protected]

友情链接: 华人找房 到家 今日支付Umall今日优选